×

    Name*

    Email*

    Your Message*

    John Ryle
    City of WordsIn Khartoum and Jelalabad the misery…

    • SHARE

    • FOLLOW

      • Home
      • About
      • Books
      • City of Words
      • Field Notes
      • Memorials
      • Reportage & Criticism
      • Research
      • Site Guide
      • Teaching
      • Translations
      • Video

    In Khartoum and Jelalabad the misery goes on

    1998: US missile attacks will be counterproductive, both in Afghanistan and in Sudan

    In Khartoum and Jelalabad the misery goes on

    1998: US missile attacks will be counterproductive, both in Afghanistan and in Sudan

    By John Ryle  •  25 August 1998  •  City of Words  •  The Guardian  •  Posted 2016  •  884 words

    The provincial city of Jelalabad, once the winter capital of Afghan kings, stands on a fertile plain in a ring of snow-capped mountains just beyond the Khyber Pass. It’s not much of a place anymore: there’s an airport, a bullet-scarred palace, a ramshackle bazaar and a hospital restored to working order by the International Committee of the Red Cross. It will be even less of a place now, after the American missile attack on terrorist training camps near there last week. But the inhabitants of Jelalabad and the surrounding villages are accustomed to bombardment. This is thanks to the stockpiles of weapons introduced to the country by the CIA and by the Soviet army in the 1970s and 1980s, and thanks to the further supplies now provided by the government of Pakistan, main sponsor of the Taliban, the Islamic fundamentalist movement which currently controls the border area—and much of the rest of Afghanistan.

    What do the American raids mean for the inhabitants of a place like this? And what do they mean for the inhabitants of Khartoum, the capital of Sudan, America’s other target in last week’s revenge attacks?

    For villagers in Jelalabad (or Khost, where the US also struck) the immediate threat of missiles from any party, internal or external, is exceeded by the constant danger of landmines, which stretch from the city to the mountains, making their immaculately terraced wheat fields and apricot orchards places of danger. When I visited the hospital in Jelalabad a few years ago it was filled with grievously injured children. The new American intervention—which, from an international perspective, may appear to have startling implications—is, for these villagers, just one more item in a bundle of afflictions. In the 1980s the CIA gave the Afghan Mujaheddin surface-to-air missiles to fight the Soviets, a significant intervention that helped turned the tide of the war. But the effect of last week’s attacks on the conflict in Afghanistan will be marginal.

    A pharmaceutical factory in Khartoum

    Khartoum North, the United States’ other target, is nothing like Jelalabad. The northern part of this huge desert city begins as a residential suburb north of the bridge over the Blue Nile, then blurs into an industrial zone stretching along the railway to Port Sudan, Khartoum’s link to the sea. Although Sudan has been at war almost as long as Afghanistan, the war has never directly affected the capital.  There have been military coups, but no significant episodes of street violence or urban terrorism—apart from the state terrorism practised by government security agencies. Aerial bombardment of rebel-held areas of Southern Sudan by government planes is routine, but a direct attack on Khartoum is something unprecedented.

    In Khartoum, and its twin city, Omdurman, the effects of war and resultant economic decline are seen most dramatically in the huge influx of displaced people from the south and west, many of them squatters in Khartoum North, the area of the city north of the Blue Nile. For a time the biggest displaced camp in Khartoum was Hillat Kusha, an industrial wasteland close to the factory targeted by last week’s missiles. Here, a few years ago, I spoke with destitute southerners living in makeshift tents in a landscape littered with twisted metal, broken glass and human faeces. (The name Hillat Kusha means Place of Garbage.) One of the few sources of income for southerners in a place like this is making alcohol, a traditional activity banned by the Islamist government. Although few southerners are Muslims, some of those prosecuted for brewing beer have been subject to the full rigours of sharia law—lashing and imprisonment.

    In recent years, as a security measure, the government of Sudan has forcibly relocated many of these Southerners to the periphery of Khartoum, where they are a less visible reminder of the dreadful human cost of the war. This forced move may, inadvertently, have removed them from the target area. The American attack will at least bring home to the inhabitants of Khartoum, northerners and southerners alike, the growing international interest in their war. But can this bring them any benefit?

    The government of Sudan has caused untold suffering to its people—hundreds of thousands of them have died as a result of the ruthless tactics employed in the war. And since the truck-bombing of the World Trade Centre in New York in 1993, which has been plausibly linked to a Sudan-based terrorist group, the US has been indirectly waging war on this government by supporting southern rebels and northern opposition groups.

    But US support for these groups, like last Thursday’s attack, clearly has less to do with concern for the well-being of the people of Sudan than with the national pride of the United States. The US does not even claim that Sudan was involved in the embassy bombings; the justification for the attack on Khartoum rests on the dubious and unproven claim that the targeted factory was part of a chemical weapons manufacturing chain. An isolated missile attack like this will do little to weaken the government of Sudan. It is more likely to strengthen it by enabling it to call on support from Arab countries. Such an attack plays into the hands of anti-American nationalist sentiment, without any lasting gain. ★

    New

    In Khartoum and Jelalabad the misery goes on

    Peace Is the Name of Our Cattle-Camp

    Social Media

    Tweets @ JohnRyle
    • More
    • Recent
    • Related
    City of Words: Introduction

    City of Words: Introduction

    Before blogs or tweets—a newspaper column from the 1990s.

    The phoenix in the burning season

    A forest fire, a mythical bird, and seven lines by William Empson

    A plague of locusts

    A Somali novelist comes face-to-face with the warlords

    A cloud over Gorée Island

    After slavery, sex tourism and bad government

    Epiphany at Pantip Plaza

    Pirate software and religious amulets in a Bangkok shopping mall

    1998: What Britain could do to stop famine in Sudan

    A former district commissioner has a better...

    Move the UN to Gibraltar

    Where it might have a better chance of doing good

    Feasts of fire

    Chinese alchemy, the Hindu festival of lights, and the anti-Catholic ritual of Bonfire Night

    Anth 351: The Interview

    In ethnographic research, oral history, human rights, journalism, literature and film

    Binyavanga Wainaina 1971-2019

    Kenneth Binyavanga Wainaina Born 18 January 1971; died 21 May 2019

    The vanishing world of the Bushmen

    The original affluent society and its encounter with modernity

    Peace Is the Name of Our Cattle-Camp

    Peace Is the Name of Our Cattle-Camp

    John Ryle and Machot Amuom
    CEU 2018: Doing good less badly

    CEU 2018: Doing good less badly

    Learning from human rights and humanitarian crises...

    30.07.2017 South Sudan: the diaspora of objects and the future of tradition

    A Norman castle in the north-east of...

    31.07.2017 Letter from Yirol

    Last month in Yirol I bought a heifer—a brindled two-year old, not yet in calf....

    Peace Is the Name of Our Cattle-Camp

    Peace Is the Name of Our Cattle-Camp

    John Ryle and Machot Amuom
    Local peace processes in Sudan

    Local peace processes in Sudan

    A baseline study: Summary This report offers a contextual analysis of the growth of “people-to-people” peace meetings...

    Prospects for relief and development operations in SPLA-controlled areas of Southern Sudan, May 1989

    Prospects for relief and development operations in SPLA-controlled areas of Southern Sudan, May 1989

    To conserve you must transform

    Culture and the wealth of nations in South Sudan

    Sudan: Unintended consequences of humanitarian assistance

    Sudan: Unintended consequences of humanitarian assistance

    A field evaluation study

    Slavery, abduction and forced servitude  in Sudan

    Slavery, abduction and forced servitude in Sudan

    Report of the Eminent Persons Group, 2002

    Refugees in their own country

    Refugees in their own country

    1992: The forced repatriation of squatters and displaced people from Khartoum

    • SHARE

    • FOLLOW

    • Africa
    • Aid & Development
    • Americas
    • Anthropology
    • Apes
    • Arms
    • Art & Design
    • Asia
    • Body Modification
    • Brazil
    • Britain
    • Cities
    • Crime
    • Culture & Society
    • Death
    • Demography
    • Economics
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Europe
    • Film
    • Fire
    • Food & Health
    • Hair
    • History
    • Humanitarianism
    • Human Movement
    • Human Rights
    • Humour
    • Information Technology
    • Journalism
    • Kinship & Family
    • Language
    • Libraries & Archives
    • Life Science
    • Literature
    • London
    • Middle East
    • Music & Dance
    • Natural History
    • New York
    • Pacific
    • Philosophy
    • Poetry
    • Politics
    • Prisons
    • Psychotherapy
    • Race
  • Religion
    • Science & Technology
    • Sexual Politics
    • Sport
    • Statistics
    • Sudans
    • Translation
    • Travel
    • Wales & the Marches
    • War
    • Writing & Editing
    All Rights Reserved 2023 © John Ryle or the named author, artist or photographer. Please write with enquiries or corrections. Site design by HonestWebsiteDesign.com